Victims of the devastating Los Angeles wildfires, potentially the costliest in U.S. history, are turning to California’s unique legal doctrine, “inverse condemnation,” to seek compensation from Southern California Edison. This doctrine allows victims to collect damages from utility companies if their equipment caused the fire, even without proving negligence.
Lawsuits have been filed against Southern California Edison, claiming its high-voltage transmission towers sparked the Eaton Fire, which was fueled by high winds and dry conditions. Edison denied any operating anomalies before or after the fire’s ignition. Despite this, California law holds utilities responsible for damage caused during public service delivery, even in the absence of negligence.
The fires, including the Palisades and Eaton blazes, have destroyed over 6,000 structures and killed at least 24 people, with damages expected to reach tens of billions of dollars. California has established a $21 billion wildfire insurance fund to ensure Southern California Edison remains solvent while victim claims are paid. However, the company’s exposure is capped at $3.9 billion.
The lawsuits seek compensation for lost wages, rebuilding costs, and other unquantifiable losses. With many lawsuits filed in California state court, the cases are expected to take years to resolve. Legal experts suggest that if Edison’s equipment is found to be the primary cause, the utility could face substantial economic damages, especially if negligence is proven.
Also read: Judge Clears Partial Release of Jack Smith’s Report on Trump Case
