President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, aims to slash $2 trillion in federal spending, including tackling the $895.2 billion defense budget. This ambitious goal faces resistance due to rising global tensions, lobbying from defense contractors, and substantial military payroll and benefits costs.
The Pentagon, which failed its seventh consecutive audit, has drawn bipartisan calls for reform. Critics like Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Ro Khanna back the effort, highlighting waste and inefficiencies, such as the $2 trillion F-35 program plagued by delays and ballooning sustainment costs.
Policy experts warn that reducing spending without cutting military personnel or benefits will be tough. Veterans’ benefits alone account for $364.8 billion, over a third of the discretionary budget. Deep cuts could impact military readiness or increase unemployment, a politically sensitive issue.
Geopolitical instability, including conflicts in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, adds to the complexity. Critics argue that excessive military spending often stems from overly aggressive foreign policies. Alternatives include scaling back U.S. commitments abroad and encouraging allies like Japan and South Korea to increase their defense spending.
DOGE’s success may hinge on implementing efficiencies, limiting emergency spending, and reducing waste in programs like the F-35. However, entrenched interests in Washington, including defense contractors and Pentagon officials, pose significant hurdles. Advocates hope the Trump administration’s revised foreign policy strategy could pave the way for a leaner, more effective defense budget.
Also read: Biden to Decide on Nippon Steel’s $15B Bid for U.S. Steel Amid Security Concerns
